Ok, the calorie count. It is so easy to give up on it on days I don't keep to it. I think what's the real point? But then on days when I've won, not my stomach, I need to record it.
So.
A shortcake thing (thought, oh god, shortcake at half one, I will lose) (200)
Beef sandwich lite (300)
An apple (40)
A bite of my friend's carrot and cheese sandwich (15)
A pasta and bean dinner (400)
A vanilla slice, which would be 286 calories but I only ate half.. I wonder if cream or shortcrust is more calorific?(150)
half a small blueberry pancake (50)
1150... that's damn good. The other day's was 1250.
Ha! Though... do I need fifty more calories? I am determined never to starve myself again. That only starts binge cycling, and I'd never vomit so I don't want to do anything like that.
I just had two more bites of cake and a biscuit. So 1240 now. But I did some walking today, so that should be ok.
So, why record the calories?
Because if I see what's going in my mouth I can see what's bad about it. Because it helps me feel I've achieved something by the end of the day. I really should give myself some sort of reward if I fall within the boundaries... wearing makeup? I don't think I could bear to do without makeup on certain days. Food is obviously a no. Shopping is tricky as money is tight for a student such as myself. A pound for every day I do it? Seven quid a week... stupid as it is, that's a tenth of my budget and I can't spare it. So how do I reward myself?
She came round tonight, and it was actually really good... I'd been worried she hated me. She must not, to want to spend time with me. And she'll see me tomorrow too, so she must not completely despise me... which is good. I vowed I'd tell her sorry though, and I haven't. That is bad. I'll tell her sorry tomorrow. Tomorrow never comes, you silly cow.
I worry that I appeared too self centred, too stupid, too everything... oh no. Why on earth does this worry always drown me? I can't think of a point in my life when I haven't believed that someone disliked me. That's obvious, I mean nobody can be loved by everyone. Or even liked by everyone. But why do I worry about it? I only worry when it's people I like, because if they dislike me then what do I do? I don't know where this fear stems from... my family, I know, have always loved me. At school, I was never popular... I'm pretty sure that for the first couple of years people hated me (I was ugly and fat, what was not to hate?) then I lost a bit of weight and wore better makeup and suddenly... I wasn't so bad. Then, here, in the first week I socialised with this group of girls who never spoke to me again, no idea why, just like that... cut me off. But, aside from these experiences, and people thinking I'm a geek, there isn't much to say I should have this huge complex about people hating me.
I must work to the bottom of it one day.
Someone on another blog today said a snippet of some shoddy poem I'd written whilst drunk was "so close", which was exciting. To think that someone else had seen my poetry, first of all, though everyone that posted on that blog was so obsessed by gastric bypass surgery they didn't really notice it... well, it wasn't so comment-worthy, excepting its incongruity. I'm not sure that's a word. How do you make pecuniary into an -ily word? An adverb, no... adjective. Some sort of comparative adjective... "Is it worth it, pecunarily speaking", would be how I'd want to use it.
I suppose we're all obsessed with something. I'm obsessed with... finding happiness. Well, everyone is, everyone is obsessed with those things that they think will make them happy. Mine happen to be learning more, gaining power, losing weight, being with friends, letting my creative juices run riot. I know that the weight thing, ultimately, is useless, and that if I keep nagging at it, I will end up obese one day... sods law. I do obsess over how others perceive me, especially if I like them. That is so that... I can monitor myself in the future and thus make them not dislike me? That, or damage minimisation... if they hate me, and I know, then I can at least arrange the artillery before the bombs come raining down, as it were.
I read a shitty book. The Hippopotamus, by Stephen Fry. It wasn't the worst book I've ever read, maybe a shade above Jilly Cooper... of that ilk. Rosamunde Pilcher et al. It's just that I adore Stephen Fry, I made plans to turn him one day and the discovery that he is none so eloquent or entertaining as I believed is shocking. The books plot leaves a lot to be desired, it appears to be fairly fantastical in a book that advocates common sense and its ending is not clearly delineated, nor presented in such a fashion as to make the reader cogitate over it. The language is not erudite or eloquent. In short, it was boorish and boring.
Back to the Dickens, then... I am reading The Old Curiosity Shop. People complain that it is boring and clunky with stereotyped characters. To them, I say nay. I like this book; slow though it may be, I like reverting to these stereotypes; isn't everyone a stereotype of something? I like the hustle and bustle of it, I like the freshness of an author writing about something verging on the scandalous (the working classes, for that audience), I even like the perfection little Nell embodies. I like the mannish Sally Brass, though I can see she's heading for a downfall (mind, if reviews are to be believed, so is little Nell, I hear she falls off that golden perch of hers at the end). Anyway, her brother isn't so cleanly cut between black and white. Even as I write all of this, I realise that Dickens is nothing more than an 18th century Jilly Cooper, a writer of escapist fiction out for a quick buck. Isn't it strange how things change with time? In a hundred years, will Jilly Cooper suddenly gain prestige? Or even something more base, such as daytime TV, or Take a Break magazine... will there be courses on it? I suppose journalism courses already exist, which I believe to be pointless; I am doing a degree to keep my options open as to what I can go into, journalism being a potential avenue. If journalism was all I wanted to do, I'd have gone straight off to work at the Times, if they'd have me, or the Guardian. Or some sort of publication. I wouldn't have dossed away frittering cash on a three year course.
I can't advocate studying the arts. Something in me knows that they are incredibly important; but the sustaining of life is more so, and that is down to the sciences. However, what is life if not filled with creativity? People manage to live very well without it. My Mum, for example, is perfectly happy without good poetry, books, knowledge of history... she enjoys other things, like fitness and seeing our family happy, or righting wrongs. I think these are all important things. She likes some history. I consider her an intelligent individual, lacking in nothing. Yet, my life without books would be bare, as would life without theatre or drawing. Most of the people I know are similar, but I interact with mainly university students and academics. Of course they'll like things like this.
You can also say that many science students go into things like engineering plastic, slimming pills, paper design... superfluous things that we don't need, that wreck the environment and do far more damage than journalists encouraging people to cogitate over the way we live. However, what scientists do reaches the masses; journalism only reaches those who read, and good journalism fewer still. Degrees like law, that help people, are useful. I do believe that instead of educating the few in the world to unreachable heights, we should be working on making those that have nothing happier. What use is learning about writers when hunger is rampant in other third world countries? What are we doing to help that, with our english? I suppose, in studying books, you know about those countries and knowledge is always the first step to help. I know that higher activity keeps us all bound together, but if it was up to me I'd make arts things far cheaper than they are and pay doctors or researchers far more.
I cannot argue for an arts degree, yet I undertake one because I can do nothing else. I am fair at maths and science, but no Einstein; I cannot cope with chemistry or the sight of blood. So I must do an arts degree.